Year 5771 is a Pregnant Year No 14 out of 19

The are 12 months each year except years 3, 6, 11, 14, 17, and 19) in each cycle of 19 years, which are called pregnant years (Shana me'uberet) because it comprises 13 months. Year 5771 is the 14^th in a cycle of 19 years and the next will fall on the Year 5774 which is the 17^th in the 19 year cycle. Why?

The Hebrew or Jewish calendar is lunisolar: a day is based on the rotation of the Earth about its axis; a month is based on the revolution of the moon about the Earth; and a year is based on the revolution of the Earth about the sun. On average, the moon revolves around the Earth approximately 29.5 days and the Earth revolves around the sun approximately 365.25 days. That’s leaves us with a 12-month lunar year that is 11 days shorter than the solar year.

Why is the solar year so important to the Jewish calendar? The Jewish holidays are strongly related to seasons. Passover (פֶּסַח, pesax) must occur in the spring as it is referred to in the Torah as the Festival of Spring (חַג הָאָבִיב, xag ha’aviv). If the calendar is based solely on the moon, the holidays will not correlate with the right seasons.

Therefore, an additional 13th month is added to the Jewish calendar every few years. The added month is called Adar Alef (first Adar) and is added just before the month of Adar (called Adar Bet – second Adar in a leap year). Adar Bet is added seven times every nineteen years (in years 3, 6, 11, 14, 17, and 19). The leap year is fuller or longer than a regular 12-month year, therefore it is called שָׁנָה מְעֻבֶּרֶת  (shana me’uberet) meaning literally a “pregnant year” – like a pregnant woman carrying inside her - a baby.

And why was the extra month chosen to be Adar? Originally, the Hebrew calendar began in Nissan, the month of the Passover holiday. The last month of the year was Adar. Therefore, it was decided to add a month to the final month of the year.

Adar Alef of the year תשע"א  (5771) is about to begin on Saturday February 5th 2011 delaying the Adar holidays (Purim) to Adar Bet. Let us hope that this “pregnant” year is fertile, happy and peaceful.

For Further Reading I submit the following:

http://sabbahillel.blogspot.com/2010/09/why-four-out-of-five-years-5771-5775.html

Why four out of five years (5771 - 5775) start on Thursday - Friday

The Jewish year has three possibilities for the number of days in a regular or leap year. The reason is that the lunar month is approximately 29.5 (twenty nine and a half) days long. If this was exact, then just alternating 29 and 30 day months would be correct. However, the exact average cycle is 29 days 12 hours 793 "parts" in length. A "part" is one in 1080 of an hour. The 793 "parts" converts to 44 minutes and 1 "part" as can be seen by looking at a chart of the molad announcements for the year. As a result, there are almost 15 minutes more than 29.5 days. This is handled by having the months of Cheshvan and Kislev be either 29 or 30 days and having the three possibilities of 29 and 29, 29 and 30, or 30 and 30. This calculation actually differs from the astronomical new moon as the year progresses. It is calculated by the total number of days in a lunar year and dividing by twelve. As a result, the actual molad can vary from the calculated value by as much as 10 hours.

Rosh Hashannah (first day) can never occur on Sunday, Wednesday, or Friday so that Yom Kippur cannot occur on Friday or Sunday and Hoshannah Rabbah can never occur on Shabbos.

Judaism 101 gives an interesting mnemonic for determining the leap years in the cycle using a piano keyboard

As can be seen the leap years are years 3, 6, 8, 11, 14, 17, and 19 (0).

This means that the pattern for these 5 years are L R R L R

A more detailed explanation is here

This makes the regular year have 353, 354, and 355 days ("adding 3, 4, or 5 days to the day of the week of Rosh Hashannah), while leap years have 383, 384, and 385 days ("adding" 5, 6, and 0). The Jewish year uses a 19 year cycle and the leap years can be shown by taking the year number as modulus 19. This year (5771) is year 14 of the cycle (year 19 of the cycle has modulus 0). The five years involved are thus 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 Year "17" is the next leap year. This year (a leap year) both Cheshvan and Kislev are 30 days so that next Rosh Hashannah (5772) will be also be on Thursday and Friday. The following year will have Cheshvan 29 days and Kislev 30 days (30 Kislev 5772 is 26 December 2011). This brings the following Rosh Hashannah (5773) to Monday and Tuesday. .

5773 will have 29 days in Cheshvan and Kislev which brings Rosh Hashannah back to Thursday again (from the modulus calculation above.) for 5774.

5774 is year 17 of the 19 year cycle and is again a leap year and again will have both Cheshvan and Kislev set to 30 days. This means that the following (regular) year of 5775 will again start on Thursday.

Since 5775 is not a leap year, Rosh Hashannah of 5776 will occur on Monday and since it is again a leap year (modulus number 0) with both Cheshvan and Kislev 30 days, the following year (5777) is again on Monday.

Larry Nussbaum pointed out by email the following five years starting with 5776 are L R R L R as well with the leap year again being "full" (both Cheshvan and Kislev having 30 days) This means that four out of those five years start on Monday, with the "off year" being Thursday. The last year of this pattern (5780) is year number 4 of the cycle, so 5781 (year 5), which starts on Shabbos,  is also regular and 5782 starts on Tuesday.  

This double pattern is quite rare. This appears to be to only such pattern (2 sets of 4 out of 5 back to back) in the past 247 years. In 5760 - 5764 we had 4  of 5 years with RH on Shabbos. There is no short cycle (like 19 or 28 years) when it comes to days of the week for yom tovim. The only cycle is a 247 year cycle (and that's not 100% guaranteed). Mr. Nussbaum also pointed out that the Tur has a 247 year calendar.

I saw this on the Mail Jewish mailing list, from Richard Fiedler

Mail.Jewish Mailing List
Volume 59 Number 26
Produced: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 01:15:16 EDT
From: Richard Fiedler 
Date: Mon, Sep 13,2010 at 10:01 PM
Subject: Dates of Rosh HaShanah

Rosh HaShanah 2013 has another extremely unusual aspect. The Old Moon will be visible on Wednesday Morning Sept 4, 2013 and we will welcome in Rosh HaShanah Wednesday Night.

The Molad of Tishrei 2013 will be Yom Chamishi (Thursday), 16 hours 830 parts. This is under the window of the Molad Zaqen rule (18 hours causes a deferral of Rosh HaShanah) that normally prevents as Old Moon from being seen Erev Rosh HaShanah.

If you will join me in Jerusalem that week I will be on Mount Scopus at 5:10 AM when the Moon will rise. The Sun will rise at 6:16 AM. We will be seeing the cause of the Gemora of Rabban Gamliel and Rabbi Yehoshua (120 CE).

The reason for this is rooted in a very exceptional lunar orbit which is taking a path below the African Continent. Here is a link to the R H van Gent chart of Lunar Visibility for that date.https://files.me.com/richardfiedler/tfsa4d

The above comment shows the "old moon" being visible the day before Rosh Hashanah by the fixed calendar. I realized as a result of a comment that I received that the Sanhedrin is based on eidus, which means that the eidim had to have seen the new moon. IIRC this is a minimum of six hours after the actual astronomic molad, which oscillates around the average announced molad. Actually, a member of the Israel New Moon Society has told me that the new moon would not be visible to the naked eye until it is at least 18 -20 hours old. The question would be when the actual astronomic "new moon" would be. I looked up on the internet and  went to a planetary body calendar website to get these values. Note that the current rule is that Daylight time in Israel ends the Sunday morning before Yom Kippur. As a result, DST ends September 8. The times shown below are therefore in Daylight Savings Time.

Moonrise and moonset in Jerusalem (DST)

Date	Moonrise	Moonset

Sep 4, 2013   5:10 AM       6:09 PM

Sep 5, 2013   6:06 AM       6:43 PM

Meridian Passing

                     Sep 4                    Sep 5       
Time:           11:42 A.M.          12:27 P.M.
Altitude:       65.6°                    61.4°
Distance:     396,157 km          392,621 km.
Illuminated: 1.5%                    0.1%

Phase: New at 2:37 P.M. Sep 5

I also checked and sunrise is 6:16 and 6:17 A.M. and sunset is 6:59 P.M. and 6:58 PM on those days. This seems to imply that IF the six hour time is correct, then the new moon would probably not be visible until 8:43 P.M. which is well after moonset. Note that the .1% illumination is at the meridian (which is "drowned out" by the noon sun) If the two hours before the new moon are linear to the 4 hours after the new moon, then the illumination would be no more than .2% and the six hours would be about .3% The previous days meridian shows 4.8% illumination which would make the moonrise illumination about 2.5%, with the sun still below the horizon. This may indeed allow it to be seen. In the case of the new moon, since the moon sets 15 minutes earlier than the sun, it would seem to be very difficult to see it. The illumination at the meridian for the day after the new moon (approximately 22 hours) is 1.0%.  If the 18 hour estimate mentioned earlier is correct, this implies that the old moon would indeed have been visible.

When the Sanhedrin is reestablished, there will be a set of 30 day months until Rosh Chodesh gets co-ordinated with the eidus and astronomical molad rather than the fixed average molad that we announce now. As a result the Sanhedrin would have had to be established a number of months before this so that Rosh Hashannah could be on Shabbos (September 7) while Elul remained 29 days.

The Name Of The Creator, Our Heavenly Father.

If someone has to ask me why I keep calling the Creator of the Universe as Yahweh; I will certainly look surprised, and answer “Well because that is his Name!” There is no longer any doubt that the Creator’s name is Yahweh, period.

I think the question that needed to be asked runs something like this, “Why is it that the majority of the English Bibles do not call the creator Yahweh, and instead call him LORD God or L_RD G_d where the Jews are concerned.

Well I present the answer to that question as prepared by EliYah (with appreciation) in this article called Commentary on the Bible Preface which must be self-explanatory. I have done small adjustments to satisfy my own perceptions.

However before I do, I’ll add a thought for what it is worth.

Different religions worship different deities which they call God. In fact there are thousands of gods that are worshiped by different people in the world. And gods they worship go by different names and they also appear in different forms and shapes. 

Because of this I have had a change of heart about the use of Yahweh’s name. 

For instance, I have always advocated that Christians are using the wrong name; saying that they should call the Christian God, Yahweh, and never the LORD God and Jehovah. I thought this was smart.

I even had the audacity to say that the Jews should change the name of their God to Yahweh from their use of L-RD G-d, Ha Shem, Adoni etc.

Now I realise that I was wrong all along.

The name of the God that people worship must commensurate with the way they worship him or her. The Catholics or Protestants or Jews worship the deity called LORD God, and that is for sure appropriate because the deity they worship, want to be worshiped in the manner they worship him and on the day on which he demands to be worshipped.

We cannot therefore all of a sudden demand that they call the deity they worship, Yahweh, because Yahweh would not like to be worshiped the way the Catholics or Protestants or Jews worship their respective gods.  

It is certain that Yahweh would actually demand a lot of changes (in fact a complete overhaul) of the way we relate to him if we want to worship him. In fact Yahweh is one and infinite and he is the creator of the Universe and he is our Father.

Christians worship a deity who is completely different don’t they? They worship a composite god comprising three different beings, namely the Father, the Son and the Holy Ghost. One cannot call such a god Yahweh can one? It is just not appropriate.

So I have stopped demanding that Christians or Jews should call the deity they worship Yahweh. Yahweh and the Christian or Jewish gods are distinctively different.

In terms of the Jews, it is not a mystery that they call the deity they worship L_rd G_d, because they did not really know Yahweh anyway. Yahweh was painfully unhappy with them and ordered them to be taken captive at the hands of the Babylonians. When they later repatriated to their home lands, their worship of Yahweh was already adulterated by the Babylonians ways of worshiping their own deity, in many areas. Typically the Sabbath was worshiped from evening to evening (a Babylonian tradition) instead of dawn to dusk or sunrise to sunset according to the Scriptures. (Compare how Yom Kippur is to be kept vis-à-vis the rest of the Feast Days are observed.) A day is not 24 hours long, only 12 hours on average followed by the night.

Anyway Yahweh is the Creator’s name, who is our Heavenly Father. We should not in our petty minds take it upon ourselves that people who are alien to Yahweh should call their God Yahweh.

That is how I view the use of the names of Yahweh now.

Anyway let’s review why the English Bible use Lord God in lieu of Yahweh. The answer presented here by EliYah is interesting. But if anyone reading this is interested in learning more, they need to know that this knowledge is available only from Yahweh. He challenges us to seek him with all our hearts, and if we do he assures us that we will find him. And when we do, we will receive wisdom and understanding as defined in Job 28:28 which reads, “And to man he said, Look, the reverence of Yahweh, that is wisdom; and to depart from evil is understanding.”  

Let me leave you to read and study the following article which explains why the name of Yahweh has been substituted in most popular English Bibles.

Commentary on Bible Prefaces

---

Before we begin it must be understood that our English bibles are not the original language in which scriptures were written. I sometimes talk to people who don't understand this very basic principle, but it is totally true. The King James Version was the first major translation into English and was created approximately 1600 years. 

Most all translations in various languages have chosen to replace the name "Yahweh" with another title or name of their choice, usually "the LORD" or "GOD" in all capital letters. The following is a commentary on the various prefaces and introductions which explain their reasoning for removing the Heavenly Father's name from English bibles. Let's start with the ever popular NIV...

10.1 New International Version - Preface

"In regard to the divine name YHWH, commonly referred to as the Tetragrammaton, the translators adopted the device used in most English versions...

This statement runs true in the majority of modern English translations. The primary reasoning for replacing the name of Yahweh with something else is 'tradition'. In other words, "As long as everyone else does it, it must be okay". 

..of rendering that name as "LORD" in capital letters to distinguish it from adonai, another Hebrew word rendered "Lord" for which small letters are used.

We can see already that replacing the name "Yahweh" with "The LORD" presents a major problem. What do they do when there is a legitimate use of the title "Lord/Master" in the original text? It might be confusing to the reader as to whether it is speaking of a human lord/master or Yahweh. 

So what to do? Their solution is to make the "Adonai" source in small letters and where the name of Yahweh exists, they'll put capital letters! In other words, if it reads "Adonai (lord/master)" In the original they will translate it as "lord" or "Lord". But if it says "Yahweh" in the original, they will render it as "LORD" in all capital letters. I doubt that half the people who read the scriptures even realizes they are doing this.

Wherever the two names stand together in the Old Testament as a compound name for God, they are rendered "Sovereign LORD.""

Now we see that a more complicated problem arises. There are instances in scripture that the Hebrew reads "Adonai Yahweh" or "Lord/Master Yahweh". If they were to put "Lord" where Yahweh exists in the original, they would have to translate the passage as "Lord the LORD"! So they translated it as "Sovereign LORD" to avoid confusion. Amazing what people will do to serve tradition and reject what Yahweh has placed in scripture!

---

10.2 Today's English Version - Preface

Following an ancient tradition,

Again, tradition is the reason. 

begun by the first translation of the Hebrew Scriptures (the Septuagint) and followed by the vast majority of English translations, the distinctive Hebrew name for God (usually transliterated Jehovah or Yahweh), is in this translation represented by "LORD."

When Adonai, normally translated "Lord," occurs preposed to Yahweh, the combination is rendered by the phrase "Sovereign LORD."

So the "Today's English Version" uses the same renderings as the NIV. All on the basis of following the others. 
 

---

10.3 Revised English Bible - Introduction to the Old Testament

The divine name (YHWH in Hebrew characters) was probably pronounced 'Yahweh',

One excuse some use for not keeping Yahweh's name in the text is that they aren't sure His name is really pronounced "Yahweh". But if a translator ever admitted that His name was definitely pronounced 'Yahweh' I'm sure they would have to answer for why they don't translate it as such. Not much motivation for seeking the truth? Maybe they really don't want to know that His name really is pronounced "Yahweh"?

but the name was regarded as ineffable, too sacred to be pronounced.

Yes, this was the doctrine that got this whole idea started. But Yahweh says:

Jeremiah 10:25a  Pour out thy fury upon the heathen that know thee not, and upon the families that call not on thy name..

and...

Joel 2:32a  And it shall come to pass, [that] whosoever shall call on the name of the YAHWEH shall be delivered..

How can anyone call on His name if it is hidden away by superstitious doctrines?

The Massoretes, therefore, wrote in the vowel signs of the alternative words adonai ('Lord') or Mighty One ('God') to warn readers to use one of these in its place.

The Massoretes were those who copied and preserved the Hebrew scriptures from scroll to scroll down through the ages. They added 'vowel signs/pointings' to the Hebrew text (which was primarily all consonants) so the language would be preserved. But when they came to the name of Yahweh, they inserted alternative vowel pointings so that the reader would not speak the name of Yahweh but say "adonai" (lord) instead. So we can see that through the ages, there has been a conspiracy to hide the name of Yahweh Almighty despite what Yahweh says in His word about how we should praise, exalt, bless, love, teach, preach, anoint, assemble, believe, give thanks, honor and call on His name.

Where the divine name occurs in the Hebrew text, this has been signalled in The Revised English Bible by using capital letters for 'LORD' or 'GOD', a widely accepted practice.

Since it is 'widely accepted', it must be truth and acceptable to do?

---

10.4 American Standard Version - Preface

"I. The change first proposed in the Appendix --- that which substitutes "Jehovah" for "LORD" and "GOD" (printed in small capitals) --- is one which will be unwelcome by many, because of the frequency and familiarity of the terms displaced. But the American Revisers, after a careful consideration, were brought to the unanimous conviction that a Jewish superstition, which regarded the Divine Name as too sacred to be uttered, ought no longer to dominate in the English or any other version of the Old Testament, as it fortunately does not in the numerous versions made by modern missionaries.

Now with some reservation I would almost have to admire those who translated the American Standard 1901 version. They at least tried to restore some truth (even though they knew it would be unwelcome) and reject the ridiculous tradition of hiding and substituting the name of Yahweh from the common reader. But then as we read on... 
 

This Memorial Name, explained in Ex. iii. 14,15 and emphasized as such over and over in the original text of the Old Testament, designates God as the Personal God, as the covenant God, the God of Revelation, the Deliverer, the Friend of his people; --- not merely the abstractly "Eternal One" of many French translations, but the ever living Helper of those who are in trouble. This personal name, with its wealth of sacred associations, is now restored to the place in the sacred text to which it has an unquestionable claim."

Sounds great so far! They can see that the scriptures do place importance on His name...over and over and over... But if you read the translation you will see that they insert the false "Jehovah" rendering that was used a total of 4 times in the King James Version! But most every scholar knows that "Jehovah" is a falsification of Yahweh's name! Click here for more information on this!

---

1.5      Revised Standard Version - Preface

Now here is the preface that really bothers me the most.

"A major departure from the practice of the American Standard Version is the rendering of the Divine Name, the "Tetragrammaton."

The Revised Standard Version translators have chosen not only to depart from the practice of the ASV translators but to berate them as well. It is in one way justified in that the ASV chose the name "Jehovah" instead of "Yahweh".

The American Standard Version used the term "Jehovah"; the King James Version had employed this in four places, but everywhere else, except in three cases where it was employed as part of a proper name, used the English word LORD (or in certain cases GOD) printed in capitals. The present revision returns to the procedure of the King James Version, which follows the precedent of the ancient Greek and Latin translators and the long established practice in the reading of the Hebrew scriptures in the synagogue.

So here we go with this 'long standing tradition' routine again.

Again, they wouldn't dare admit that they are totally certain. However it is totally certain that His name is not pronounced "The Lord".

(While it is almost if not quite certain that the Name was originally pronounced "Yahweh",)..this pronunciation was not indicated when the Masoretes added vowel signs to the consonantal Hebrew text.

Of course not, they favored tradition over commandments!

To the four consonants YHWH of the Name, which had come to be regarded as too sacred to be pronounced, they attached vowel signs indicating that in its place should be read the Hebrew word Adonai meaning "Lord" (or Mighty One meaning "God"). The ancient Greek translators substituted the word Kyrios (Lord) for the Name. The Vulgate likewise used the Latin word Dominus. The form "Jehovah" is of late medieval origin; it is a combination of the consonants of the Divine Name and the vowels attached to it by the Masoretes but belonging to an entirely different word. The sound of Y is represented by J and the sound of W by V, as in Latin.

They even share how this idea of substituting His name got started. It amazes me that some will follow the Jewish tradition that breaks the commandment of Yahweh but they'll ignore the Jew's examples of where they actually do keep the Torah/Law of Yahweh!

For two reasons the Committee has returned to the more familiar usage of the King James Version: (1) the word "Jehovah" does not accurately present any form of the Name ever used in Hebrew; and

Ahh! Notice how they conveniently forget to mention why they reject the name "Yahweh" in their 'reasons'!

(2) the use of any proper name for the one and only God, as though there were other gods from whom He had to be distinguished, was discontinued in Judaism before the Christian era and is entirely inappropriate for the universal faith of the Christian Church."

Who are they to decide what is appropriate for one's faith?? Their job is to translate, not decide what we are to believe! This statement is a sad commentary of how far some have gone from the scriptures. Not only do they say why they have chosen to replace Yahweh's name with a title of their choosing but they also state that 'use of any proper name...is entirely inappropriate!' Amazing! Who invented the idea of having a name of our Creator? Is it not Yahweh Himself?? Is Yahweh also 'entirely inappropriate' for placing His name there in scripture over 6000 times?? Are they saying indeed that the one whom they claim to worship is 'entirely inappropriate' for placing His name there? Oh my! They say it is 'entirely inappropriate for the universal faith of the Christian Church.' Why have a different substitution for the name "Yahweh" in each language? Would it not be more 'universal' to use ONE NAME? Yahweh has said:

Malachi 1:11a (NKJV) For from the rising of the sun, even to its going down, My name shall be great among the Gentiles.

Why have they falsified our Creator's name and condemned Yahweh for putting it there originally? It is just sad.

---

10.6 New King James Version - Word study on Exodus 3:15 (New Open Bible)

Now I do like this word study. Even though the NKJV translators followed the traditions of the elders and forsook the idea of keeping Yahweh's name in the text, whoever wrote this word study is very frank about what actually is taking place.

Exodus 3 records one of the greatest revelations in the Old Testament: the personal name of God. (The words translated God in our Bible [El, Mighty One, Eloah] are not names, but the standard vocabulary for the Deity and even for false gods.

God told Moses His plan to use him in delivering the Israelites from Egyptian bondage, and Moses had asked whom He should tell the people had sent him. God answered Moses: "I AM WHO I AM." He told Moses to tell them the "I AM" had sent him, "the LORD God." "I AM" and "LORD" are both probably derived from the Hebrew verb to be (hayah) because God is the ever-present One, "the Eternal" (Moffatt translation).

Many people are puzzled that in this and many other (over six thousand!) passages some Bibles read LORD in all capitals (e.g., KJV, NKJV, NIV), some read "Jehovah" (ASV, DARBY), and some read "Yahweh" (Yerusalayim Bible). Why such a radical difference? Do the manuscripts vary that much? No, not at all.

Because the name of God is so important---Jews devoutly refer to Him as "the Name" (ha Shem)---it is well worth exploring this revelation in sOne detail. It is merely a question of a Jewish tradition and how various Christian Scholars handle that tradition.

In the Ten Commandments, God forbids taking His name "in vain". That is, we should not bear false witness in oaths and probably should avoid using profanity, as well. In their great fear of violating this command, devout Hebrews went beyond the law, and when they read the Hebrew Scriptures aloud they would read the word Lord (Adonai) whenever they saw the four letters (YHWH, or traditionally JHVH in Latin pronunciation) that spelled out God's revealed covenant name. This was the sacred name by which He had committed Himself to Israel as a nation.

The most ancient copies of the Hebrew text were written in consonants only.

Actually there are some semi-vowels..as any good book on Hebrew grammar will tell you.

As the language became less and less used, scholars (call Masoretes) added little dots and dashes called "vowel points" to indicate how the text was to be pronounced. Oddly enough, they put the vowels that go with the word Adonai together with the sacred four letter name (called "tetragrammaton") to guide the readers to say Adonai aloud in synagogue services.

11 The Name Jehovah

This is the origin of the name "Jehovah." It is actually a hybrid name, combining the vowels of Adonai with the consonants of YHWH into JeHoVaH or YeHoWaH (the "a" of Adonai is changed for reasons of Hebrew pronunciation). The people who produced this name were medieval Christian Hebrew Scholars; the Jews never acknowledged such a name. The defense of this Christian hybrid is the same as the defense of the Jewish avoidance of pronouncing the name---tradition!

No surprise there. (I didn't add the "!")

There are many lovely hymns and paraphrases of the Psalms that use this name, so it would be a loss to eliminate it from our Christian vocabulary.

Choose 'what seems right to a man' over the truth? (See the study on the name "Jehovah")

The poetical form of Jehovah is Jah

12 The Name Yahweh 

It is very likely that the name was pronounced very much like "Yahweh." Comparisons with transliterations of the name into other alphabets from very ancient times confirm this. The best argument for the spelling is that it is probably the historically accurate.

Thank you.

However, the RSV's 1952 introduction explained its reason for rejecting "Yahweh" in the translation. It said that it lacks devotional qualities for English-speaking Christians. It is true that many names beginning with "Y" seem odd to our culture (all the names in English --- including Jesus---were pronounced with a Y sound, in the original, as in "hallelu-Yah").

Just totally amazing...

13 LORD

Most recent major English Bibles, dissatisfied with both Jehovah and Yahweh, have retained the KJV's LORD (the 1901 text read Jehovah.)

Oh but Yahweh is certainly dissatisfied with THEM. They have failed to take in account something very important to HIM.
 

---

The following is a summary of the excuses that they have used for their refusing to insert the true name Yahweh.

•  It's used in most English versions
• We're following an ancient tradition
• The word "Jehovah" does not accurately present any form of the Name ever used in Hebrew (What about "Yahweh"??)
• Use of any proper name...is entirely inappropriate
• It lacks devotional qualities

Amongst all these reasons, is there not something missing here?

YES, it is something that they have gone over painstakingly word for word! Something called THE WORD OF YAHWEH. Not once did they quote a scripture to back up their excuses!

We have heard the excuses, now let's see what Yahweh's word has to say about His name:

1Kings 18:24 (KJV) And call ye on the name of your Mighty One, and I will call on the name of Yahweh: and the Mighty One that answereth by fire, let him be Mighty One. And all the people answered and said, It is well spoken.

Now I would like to touch on something ironic here. If you haven't read this story of Mt. Carmel, go to your scriptures and read it now or click here to read it. This is the prophet Yilyah (Elijah) speaking these words. He said "call ye on the name of your elohim, and I will call on the name of Yahweh". What was the name of their elohim? It is BAAL. What is amazing here is that Baal means "Lord" in Hebrew! Here is Brown's Driver/Briggs Lexicon on this Hebrew name of "Baal".

01168 Ba`al {bah'-al}

the same as 01167; TWOT - 262a

AV - Baal 62, Baalim 18; 80

Baal = "lord" 
n pr m 
1) supreme male divinity of the Phoenicians or Canaanites 
2) a Reubenite 
3) the son of Jehiel and grandfather of Saul 
n pr loc 
4) a town of Simeon, probably identical to Baalath-beer

There is your proof. What is sad is that the translators RETAINED the name of the idol Baal but REJECTED the name of the true Mighty One of the Scriptures! Continuing with our scriptures...Yahweh said:

Isaiah 42:8 I am YAHWEH, that is My name; And My glory I will not give to another, Nor My praise to carved images.

Malachi 2:2  If you will not hear, And if you will not take it to heart, To give glory to My name," Says YAHWEH of hosts, "I will send a curse upon you, And I will curse your blessings. Yes, I have cursed them already, Because you do not take it to heart.

Psalm 105:1 Oh, give thanks to YAHWEH! Call upon His name; Make known His deeds among the peoples!

Psalms 116:17- I will offer to thee the sacrifice of thanksgiving, and will call upon the name of YAHWEH.

Isaiah 12:4  And in that day you will say: "Praise YAHWEH, call upon His name; Declare His deeds among the peoples, Make mention that His name is exalted.

Zechariahariah 13:9- And I will bring the third part through the fire, and will refine them as silver is refined, and will try them as gold is tried: they shall call on my name, and I will hear them: I will say, It [is] my people: and they shall say, Yahweh is my Mighty One.

This is only a small sampling of the hundreds of scriptures that tell us of the importance of His name. I invite you to consider these others by clicking here.

In conclusion it is very evident that Yahweh's name is important to Him but it apparently was not important to those who have translated His word into the English language. Therefore we must make every effort when we see His name substituted in our scriptures to restore them back as we read them. We cannot change what has already been done but we can zealously return to the faith which was once delivered to the saints.